Billy Harris vs Borna Gojo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance compare? Harris has recently secured 45.06% of points, closely matched by Gojo with 45.14%.
• Return game differences are slight: Harris wins 45.11% of opponents' second serve points, while Gojo captures 45.79%.
• First serve return stats reveal Harris leading slightly with 23.61% against Gojo's 23.13%.
• Under pressure, Harris saves 55.08% of breakpoints; Gojo follows with 54.1%.
• Overall performance over the past year shows Harris with a nearly balanced 49.4% win rate, while Gojo achieved a stronger 60.47%.
• Surface preference hints: Harris excels on Grass with a 63% win rate, whereas Gojo favors Hard surfaces, boasting 62%.
• At the Challenger/ITF level, Harris wins 55.26% of matches, compared to Gojo's 66.67% success rate.
• Opponents' average rank suggests Harris faces stronger competition, with an average rank of 196.17 versus Gojo's 210.05.
• If considering a deciding set, Harris triumphs 53% of the time compared to Gojo’s 39% success rate.
• On breakpoint conversion, both players are nearly tied, with Harris at 29.57% and Gojo slightly higher at 30%.

Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):

With a closely matched second serve statistic, Gojo only slightly edges out Harris in this area. While both players demonstrate comparable return game abilities, Harris exhibits a marginal advantage in first serve returns.

When placed under pressure, Harris's slight superiority in saving breakpoints could prove advantageous in high-stakes moments. Surface preference analysis suggests Harris might struggle more against Gojo's formidable record on Hard surfaces.

Even though Harris contends with more skilled opponents, Gojo’s higher win percentages reflect robust performance, especially in equivalent tournament levels. A higher success rate in deciding sets highlights Harris’s resilience in tense matches.

Given these factors, Gojo emerges as the probable victor, backed by a stronger recent win percentage and effective performance at the Challenger/ITF level.